On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:34:38 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
TA> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:44 -0700 Ganga wrote:
TA> > GB>  I have a requirement of doing snmpget on multiple ip address for the
TA> > GB>  same objectid. 
TA> 
TA> Very useful, in fact. I'd *love* to see this applied, either as a patch to
TA> snmpget or as a new utility. If the latter, there'd probably be an argument
TA> for not restricting it to GET only.

I can see it for the single request operations: get, set, getnext and snmptrap.
I'm not so sure about snmpgetbulk or snmpwalk.

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
<irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to