This is some problem! Apparently, the Tools (snmpget et. al.) does not "know" of any inetCidrRouteTable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: snmpwalk udp6:ip6-localhost inetCidrRouteTable inetCidrRouteTable: Unknown Object Identifier (Sub-id not found: (top) -> inetCidrRouteTable) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However *something* is known to the Agent because the OID "works": [EMAIL PROTECTED]: snmpwalk udp6:ip6-localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.24 IP-MIB::ip.24.7.1.7.2.16.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.7.2.16.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 3 IP-MIB::ip.24.7.1.7.2.16.32.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3.1.3.2.16.63.254.1.0.0.3.4.1.2.96.103.255.254.119.3.226 = INTEGER: 3 IP-MIB::ip.24.7.1.7.2.16.63.254.1.0.0.3.4.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.64.1.2.2.16.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 3 IP-MIB::ip.24.7.1.7.2.16.63.254.1.0.0.3.4.1.2.17.133.255.254.127.130.179.128.1.1.2.16.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 1 IP-MIB::ip.24.7.1.7.2.16.254.128.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.64.1.5.2.16.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 3 .... Snipped many, many similar lines on the assumption that it is Garbage. Using "ethereal" determine whether the Agent returns quality information and the tools are mis-representing it or the Agent is producing garbage, i see the same extremely long OID's returned from the Agent and "feeding" back into the "snmpwalk". I assume that the Agent produces garbage, but, I do not like that the tools do not know of the "inetCidrRouteTable" - I think the root cause is that the build is broken somehow?? -----Original Message----- From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8. april 2005 17:48 To: Frithiof Jensen (AH/LMD) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Cannot see "ipRouteTable" with IPv6 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:07:35 +0200 Frithiof wrote: FJ> > Try the inetCidrRouteTable instead. FJ> FJ> As in --with-mib-modules=" ... ip-forwarding-mib/inetCidrRouteTable ... "? As I said, it should be included if you --enable-mfd-rewrites. So what I meant was, try a snmpwalk of inetCidrRouteTable instead of ipRouteTable. You should get v4 and v6 route info. FJ> Does the creation of the *Route* tables in any way depend on the status of FJ> the "ipForwarding" flag? No. -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted unless they are requests for paid consulting services. Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
