On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 15:44, Robert Story wrote:
> However, it leaves me wondering why we shouldn't just merge the two.
> When would one ever use the instance handler?
a) I dunno, ask Wes. That's one of his
b) If (for some unexplained reason) you wanted
to implement a table one element at a time.
In general, I'd tend to agree - I don't believe that the instance
handler is particularly useful. (And the relevant discussion
in That Bloody Book would leave the reader in no doubt of my
opinions here!)
But this is one of Wes' helpers, so I'm reluctant to simply
drop it. Particularly since it's probably more widely used
than the (superior, IMO) scalar handler.
But you should be used to the English Way of Doing Things by now :-)
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
