On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:27:13 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > The file pci.h isn't actually needed, except for it's typedefs of
DS> > u8, u16 and u32.
DS>
DS> Is there any reason for using these type names rather than
DS> 'u_int8_t', etc?
DS> I thought those were the "standard" typedefs for fixed-size variables?
I'm not using them, ethtool.h is. So, we either need a standard header to
define them for us, or define them ourselves before including ethtool.h (which
is actually what the original patch submitted did).
DS> > If you can find a file that exists for 9 and Fedora, I'll be glad to
DS> > update configure/code to use it...
DS>
DS> <asm/types.h> is needed for RH9, and should be safe enough under Fedora.
DS> But it doesn't feel quite right, somehow....
On YellowDog (Fedora-ish ppc clone), that gets me __u8, but not u8.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
