> TA> Otherwise, shall we rather use an SONAME like "libnetsnmp.so.5.<minor>" > TA> (e.g. libnetsnmp.so.5.2) and thus require applications to relink when > TA> upgrading from 5.x to 5.y? >
RS>Makes us two. However, this'd be a quite significant decision, so more RS>feedback/votes are highly appreciated. I vote yes. RS>Also, if we'd decide to do it, RS>shall we start it from 5.3 onwards? Or for all upcoming 5.[123] releases? All releases. We have had changes that apply to all releases. We have had problems in the past with people linking to old libraries when they have a mixtures of installs, some not properly removed. This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
