>>>>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:00:14 -0700 (PDT), "David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
David> I believe that the current NET-SNMP code makes too many David> assumptions that only USM is present with SNMPv3. Err... I've sent SNMPv3/KSM traps before. I'm not sure why you say that. David> Also, the code on my agent use the community table found in RFC David> 3584 to map between community string values and security name David> and engineID. It doesn't appear to me that NET-SNMP does David> this. Using this table changes how you look at SNMP security!) We've never implemented the community mib yet. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
