On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:26:46 -0800 Wes wrote: WH> >>>>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:44:29 +0000, Dave Shield WH> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: WH> WH> >> 2) --with-cflags=-DDISMAN_EVENT_OLD_IMPLEMENTATION WH> WH> Dave> Yuck!! WH> Dave> Sorry - I *MUCH* prefer the previous approach. WH> WH> FYI, I think it's a mistake to include 2 different almost identical WH> named .h files for doing the same thing. IMHO, we should not be WH> requiring a change in configure options to get the new version. We WH> should be using the old header to include the new files.
I agree with this, and that's why I changed it to do exactly that. WH> It seems wiser to me to move the old header to old-disman-event.h or WH> something so people have to explicitly request it. I considered that too, but don't really like that option. But if it's the will of the people... More on this in my response to Dave's message.. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
