On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 09:58 +0000, Dave Shield wrote: > I could live with issuing a warning about the change, but continuing > the configuration to use the new implementation anyway. That wouldn't > require touching anything, but would still alert people that things > had changed. Or alerting those who bother to read the messages, anyway.
As those who watch the CVS log messages may have noticed, I submitted something along these lines yesterday. Give it a whirl, and see what you think. My plan for this weekend is to update the 'snmpd.conf' man page to cover the various new features that have been added recently (and probably restructure things a bit). One thing that worries me is that this man page is already rather long - 16 pages or so - and that will inevitably grow as more and more gets documented. What do people think about splitting this into a number of separate man pages? The basic "man snmpd.conf" would give a general overview (and brief descriptions of each directive), but would point to another man page for the full details. Does that sound as if it would be helpful, or more confusing? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
