On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:12:57 +0000 Dave wrote: DS> Are you sitting down, Robert? DS> I'm about to agree with you - I think we probably DS> should plan to cut another 5.0.x release. DS> DS> But that's only partly because of this problem - I'm DS> not convinced it warrants opening up a closed line DS> by itself.
Me neither, now that I've tried the exact test suggested and been unable to see a leak. DS> But I don't think this is particularly urgent, and we DS> should really get the 5.2.2 and 5.3 releases out of DS> the way first. Yes, please! 2 simultaneous releases is quit enough, thanks. DS> (And probably update 5.1.x first, or at least simultaneously). 5.1.3.1 doesn't have the same potential leak, so it's really a matter of whether or not the license issue warrants an immediate release. There are other fixes in 5.1.x though. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
