On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 10:09 -0500, Robert Story wrote: > DS> (And probably update 5.1.x first, or at least simultaneously). > > 5.1.3.1 doesn't have the same potential leak, so it's > really a matter of whether or not the license issue > warrants an immediate release.
A release - yes. An immediate release - no. If nothing else, I'd like to see a little more live testing of the 5.2.2 rewrite. Plus: > 2 simultaneous releases is quit enough, thanks. :-) > There are other fixes in 5.1.x though. Good. If we're going to make a release, it might as well be as complete as we can sensibly make it. There's no point in excluding fixes for no good reason. My characteristic obstinacy is more concerned with balancing bug fixes against a desire for stability, rather than any particular preference for buggy code :-) Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
