Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:11:14 +0100 Dave wrote: > DS> On 26/07/06, G. S. Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DS> > Thought it might be good idea to add the SNMP rfcs to the distro... > DS> > DS> The full RFCs, rather than just the MIB files, you mean? > > Actually, it's just the RFCs for the protocol/smi, I think. Not any of the MIB > RFCs. > > Do you think we should include MIB RFCs too?
I vote just the RFCs (protocol/smi) too...the extracted MIBs are elsewhere...and not sure how much added value there is in repeating them within the RFCs. > > > DS> > under top nevel net-snmp/rfcs? > DS> > or net-snmp/doc/rfcs? > DS> > DS> I'd vote for putting these under 'docs' - there's too much at the top > DS> level already. I wouldn't want to see this cluttered up any more. > > I agree 100%. I'd be ok w/doc, but have a slight preference for docs. > I did a little survey of the free software packages I have on disk (albeit a small cross-section) and the most common is 'doc' and BIND has doc/rfc... I know ..."a foolish consistency....blah blah blah" :) -G ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
