On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:32:46 -0400 G. wrote: GSM> also noting that the commit I have would contain the most updated versions GSM> (i.e., +errata).
How many of the RFCs contained errata? GSM> I think like anything, we would do our best to keep everything as updated GSM> as possible... I think this needs to be a bit more explicit. What do others think of shipping patched RFCs vs shipping the stock RFCs + errata notes? There are a few options: 1) stock RFCs + single errata file (rfcXXXX.txt; ERRATA/README.errata/?) 2) stock RFCS + individual errata (rfcXXXX.txt; rfcXXXX.errata) 3) patched RFCs + original RFCs (rfcXXXX.txt; rfcXXXX.orig) 4) patched RFCS + README explaining that files are patched; url for originals My preference would be 2, 1, 3, 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
