Wes Hardaker wrote: > Robert> So, what I proposed is that we leave a little wiggle room in > Robert> the versioning. Can't do much about 5.1 and 5.2 - they are > Robert> already sandwiched (well, 5.1 isn't yet, but it's about to > Robert> me. More on that in a sec). But we can make room for 5.3. I > Robert> proposed that we reserve room for 10 update, not because I > Robert> think we'll need that many, but because it's a nice round > Robert> number and it's better to be safe than sorry. That would mean > Robert> using '20' instead of '11' for 5.4, and '30' for 5.5, etc. > > Ugggg.... I'll need to let that one sit in my head a bit.
Since 5.4 is approaching, we finally need to come up with a decision on this. Any further comments? I'm still on the fence, giving others the chance to convince me either way. But if we went for "leave room", I'd stick with a realistic "leave room for 1 incompatible change" (i.e. 5.4 would be 12, 5.5 would be 14 etc.) rather than 10. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
