>>>>> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> Given that 5.4 enables embedded Perl and Perl modules by default, shouldn't TA> dist/net-snmp.spec be updated to reflect that? TA> Otherwise, I'm not sure a default rpmbuild will work too well. Probably, but I think it'll work either way. Actually by leaving the flags on it makes sure that configure will try and build it and thus you'll get an error if it fails (as opposed to the feature drop). An error in this is probably better since any system that's using RPM should likely be problematic if it couldn't do perl. TA> @Wes: Do spec file changes require a rfv? fine line. I'd say yes, but the packager may have to tweak things later anyway... -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
