Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> TA> Given that 5.4 enables embedded Perl and Perl modules by default, 
> shouldn't
> TA> dist/net-snmp.spec be updated to reflect that?
> 
> TA> Otherwise, I'm not sure a default rpmbuild will work too well.
> 
> Probably, but I think it'll work either way.  

I've tried it and it fails if you don't explicitely enable Perl. Well,
it actually always fails because you've added a reference to a patch we
don't ship so it breaks even earlier.

May I fix this directly in CVS?


+Thomas

-- 
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to