On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:04:32 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> On ons, 2007-01-17 at 09:53 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
MF> 
MF> +                        (void *)'help');
MF> 
MF> Interesting char constant there, I suppose you did mean (void*)"help"?

Actually not. I'm just using the void pointer as 4 bytes of context. I could
just as well used #define LIB_INIT_LIB_HELPERS 0x01. Probably should have, as
it would cause less confusion...

MF> -void
MF> -netsnmp_init_helpers(void)
MF> +int
MF> +_netsnmp_init_helpers_callback( int majorID, int minorID,
MF> 
MF> is there any reason for _netsnmp_init_helpers_callback not being static?

Nope, good point.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to