Wes Hardaker wrote:
> In the end, I still think that moving libhelpers -> libagent entirely
> is not only significantly cleaner, it's far less error prone for both
> us and users, and 99% of the time going to be what the users need in
> the first place.  I have yet to be convinced otherwise.

Are you proposing to move libnetsnmphelpers content to libnetsnmpagent and not
ship libnetsnmphelpers with 5.5 at all? If so, are we fine with requiring
developers who don't use net-snmp-config in their Makefiles to manually remove
-lnetsnmphelpers from their link line?


+Thomas

-- 
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to