Mitsuru Chinen wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:06:03 +0900 > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Then, how about the attached patch? >> The patch fixes the long long issue, but doesn't address the HAVE_INTMAX_T issue. As I mentioned in my original email, should we change:
typedef long long intmax_t; typedef unsigned long long uintmax_t; to: typedef int64_t intmax_t; typedef uint64_t uintmax_t; I can test the patch and any other changes on the weekend. Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
