Mitsuru Chinen wrote: >> Mitsuru Chinen wrote: > But I reviewed the code, I'm getting to think it's better to > prepare both case than to replace long long to uint64_t. > And at the snmplib/snmp_client.c, I think it's better to prepare > code for both unsigned long long and uintmax_t. > > According to the preprocess of include/net-snmp/types.h, there is a > case where the bit range of int64_t is not 64. In such case, int64_t > is defined as long type and _INT64_IS_NOT_64BIT is defined. >>From C99 standard, long long type is wider or equal to long type. > To be on a safe side, I think it's better to define intmax_t > as long long type if it's available.
Thanks for the patch! I tried it on Windows and it compiles fine. Is everyone else ok with the patch? Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
