Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/06/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Patch 1737727 brings up an interesting (as always) conflict dilemma.
>> Anyone have thoughts on it?
> 
> The obvious approach would be something like:
> 
> #define  NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RONLY        0x1
> #define  NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RWRITE       0x2
> #define  NETSNMP_OLDAPI_NOACCESS 0x3
> 
> #ifndef NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE
> #define RONLY        NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RONLY
> #define RWRITE       NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RWRITE
> #define NOACCESS  NETSNMP_OLDAPI_NOACCESS
> #endif

+1

(I'd think the subject should have been rewritten to start with "rfv: ",
though, for max. attention)


+Thomas

-- 
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to