Ok, I hope to be able to submit the patches tonight.

On 9/12/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Shield schrieb:
> > I'm inclined to suggest that the problematic #defines are protected by
> > #ifndef NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS
> >
> > and that the config also sets up
> >
> > #ifdef NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE
> > #define NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS
> > #endif
>
> Agreed.
>
> >> I don't have access to subversion here. Who introduced
> >> NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE in revision 15493?
> >
> > That would be Thomas.
> > As was NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE in r15194.
> > (Which is why I phrased the question in the way I did!)
>
> As for NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE, I think I've checked in a patch proposed
> by someone else, but I'm taking full responsibility anyway (especially
> for forgetting that I've introduced NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS
> earlier). The above should provide a clean fix, though.
>
>
> +Thomas
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to