Hey, Would like to raise this question to the top of the stack once more. It has evolved into two questions.
- Do we want to move the RONLY, RWRITE, NOACCESS defines? - Which of NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS or NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE do we use to hide the old defines. For the first question I could submit a patch with the following contents: DS> #define NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RONLY 0x1 DS> #define NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RWRITE 0x2 DS> #define NETSNMP_OLDAPI_NOACCESS 0x3 DS> DS> #ifndef NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS DS> #define RONLY NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RONLY DS> #define RWRITE NETSNMP_OLDAPI_RWRITE DS> #define NOACCESS NETSNMP_OLDAPI_NOACCESS DS> #endif About the second quesion: there was a short discussion about the NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE vs. NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS. It seems NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS was there first, so I suggest we take that one. Do we also want a patch which converts all NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE into NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS? I don't have access to subversion here. Who introduced NETSNMP_CLEAN_NAMESPACE in revision 15493? Where can he/she be reached? Cheers, Thijs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
