On 15/07/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the risk imposed by your patch on builds with potential > other/future MinGW versions that do ship with localtime_r?
I've checked the latest MinGW source code, and this does not include localtime_r, so there's no immediate problem. I would envisage that the next round of Net-SNMP releases would include a proper configure test for this API call, so there'd be no clashes in the future either. (I also strongly suspect that this routine isn't regarded as part of a "minimalistic" GNU for Windows environment, since there have been reports of it being missing going back over five years). Initially I've been more concerned with addressing the immediate issue, which is that the current code does not build under MinGW at all. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
