Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/07/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One of us must be confused by 'win32' vs. 'include', I guess.
>
> Doh!
> My apologies. Hadn't spotted you were talking about that one.
>
>
> Strictly speaking, yes - the win32 header files should probably
> include the same definitions. But since these particular functions
> aren't implemented under Windows (AFAIK), then the default
> behaviour (to not define the corresponding tokens) is actually
> correct anyway.
>
> I'm not sure what the purpose of win32/include/net-snmp-config.h.in
> is anyway. Does anything actaully use this?
win32/Configure
And given that changes to include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h too often
haven't been mirrored to win32/include/net-snmp-config.h{,.in} even if
they should have been, I think we desperately need to document our build
system for ourselves (and other interested people). Let alone improving it.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
