On 08/04/2008, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I have applied the container-atomic-insert.patch as well as
> net-snmp-5.3-shared-ip-4.patch on the release Net-SNMP 5.3.1.

I'm not sure whether it's sensible to apply *both* patches.
According to the comments in that tracker item, the container
patch is meant as an *alternative* to the original shared-ip patch.
I have no idea whether the two work together cleanly or not.


I'm inclined to second Thomas' suggestion.   Forget about patching
the code yourself.   Grab a copy of the net-snmp-svn-V5-3-patches....
tarball from http://www.net-snmp.org/nightly/tarballs/
   At least that way we know you're working with a clean code base.

Remove any existing Net-SNMP installations,
configure, compile and install this, and then try your tests again.
If they still don't work, please tell us *exactly* what requests you
attempted, how the agent was configured, what you expected to
see and what actually happened.
   Looking back through your earlier queries, they tend to be a
bit light on detail, which makes it difficult for us to assist you.

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to