On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dave Shield <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 31 March 2010 09:44, Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On most 64-bit systems sizeof(int) == 4 and on some others sizeof(int) ==
> 8.
>
> But what is the value of INT32_MAX on such systems?
> I would expect that to be 0x7fffffff regardless of the value of sizeof(int)
>
> I may well be missing something here, but I don't see how the size of
> an integer or long is relevant (as long as it's not *less* than 32-bits!).
>
> The patch is designed to limit the values reported to be no greater
> than INT32_MAX - regardless of whether the variable can actually hold
> a larger value.
>
> Have I misunderstood what you're trying to say?
>
Sorry, I hadn't read the original e-mail carefully enough. I agree that
INT32_MAX should be independent of the system the Net-SNMP source code is
compiled on, the compiler and the compiler flags.
Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
