On 6 December 2010 21:57, Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > MF> I would prefer if this error showed up somewhere close to the transport > MF> search code and not down here but if could be moved later. > > I was trying to stick with existing convention of testing functions in > the function checking space. I actually *wanted* to write it up previously.
The categorisation of tests within configure.d/* was only ever meant as a first-pass attempt to divide the monolithic configure.in script into bite-size chunks. It was never intended to act as a straightjacket to hamper a more focused arrangement in the future. If there's a particular test that is inherently linked with one aspect of functionality, and would most naturally appear in the relevant block - then do feel free to place it there. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
