On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:42:31AM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > I ended up applying the first (the one that removes the call from the > perl module itself). I agree it's redundant (now) to have it in there.
Thanks a lot! > I think the proper thing to do would be to do this and also have command > line tools, eg, suppress the stderr warning by checking themselves if > nothing is enabled and turning on stderr themselves. This gets ugly for > other reasons though. I don't know what original problem that warning was meant to solve, but wouldn't it be easier to just drop it? Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
