>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:01:32 +0100, Martin Buck
>>>>> <[email protected]> said:
MB> I don't know what original problem that warning was meant to solve, but
MB> wouldn't it be easier to just drop it?
I agree, it's not too helpful. The discussion was from quite a while
ago and I agree it's probably not worth keeping.
So the discussion (and I don't want to drop this without getting
opinions from others) would be to drop this message:
"No log handling enabled - using stderr logging\n");
Here's the deal:
1) if they're watching stderr, this probably won't surprise them that
stuff is going to stderr.
2) if they're not watching stderr, then this message will never be seen
anyway.
Thoughts?
[+1 to drop from me]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
