On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:40 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:01:32 +0100, Martin Buck > >>>>> <[email protected]> said: > > MB> I don't know what original problem that warning was meant to solve, but > MB> wouldn't it be easier to just drop it? > > I agree, it's not too helpful. The discussion was from quite a while > ago and I agree it's probably not worth keeping. > > So the discussion (and I don't want to drop this without getting > opinions from others) would be to drop this message: > > "No log handling enabled - using stderr logging\n"); > > Here's the deal: > > 1) if they're watching stderr, this probably won't surprise them that > stuff is going to stderr. > > 2) if they're not watching stderr, then this message will never be seen > anyway.
If they aren't watching stderr then the application might hang waiting for someone to read the message... +1 /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
