On 10 May 2011 00:08, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote: > 2) We can, however, extend [the Host Resources MIB] by adding objects to the > Net-SNMP MIB tree that adds the needed functionality or definitions.
> For things like this, we'd need to create an extension table in the > Net-SNMP tree, which is a bit more work (or get the official MIB updated > instead). > > AK> Which approaches could I take to have the offical Net-SNMP release be > AK> able to provide more process related information? > > First off, if you have new things to submit and wan them to be > considered, the right thing to do (when your patches are ready) are to > post them to: > > http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/ I would suggest that before getting to the point of developing code and submitting patches, it's probably worth describing the extensions that you are considering in a bit more detail. It may be that other contributors can make suggestions as to how such extensions might be structured and what information should be included. Particularly if this information is likely to prove useful to a wider range of architectures than simply Linux systems. We wouldn't want to end up with separate HostRes extension tables for Linux, Solaris, Windows, *BSD, etc! Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
