On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:07:29 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> On 05/15/18 10:57, Robert Story wrote: BVA> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote: BVA> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be BVA> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is BVA> > BVA> > I don't think this meets the criteria for a show-stopper, BVA> > since it's not part of the default build. BVA> > BVA> > -1 BVA> BVA> Hello Robert, BVA> BVA> Can you name one open source project other than Net-SNMP for BVA> which its maintainers consider it acceptable that a BVA> combination of configure options leads to a build failure?
I didn't say it was acceptable. I said it didn't meet the criteria for a show stopper. Per our policy, the condition relating to configure and build is: A condition such that a default "configure; make; make install" fails to complete successfully on a supported system. So I voted against it for 5.8.rc2. It is a bug, so it would obviously go into the 5-8-patches and master branches after release. This release has been dragging along (for which I'm largely to blame), but I'm trying to get it wrapped up. That said, the policy also states: Paramount: A condition that is agreed upon by at least +3 developers when discussed on the coders list. The concept of a "show stopper" is always based on agreement of the active developers We're at +2 now (assuming an implied +1 from your message/tone). Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
