On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:12:18 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> writes: WH> WH> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote: WH> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be WH> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is WH> > WH> > I don't think this meets the criteria for a show-stopper, WH> > since it's not part of the default build. WH> WH> It breaks that configure option entirely without the patch. WH> It's a +1 for me since it breaks compilation entirely if that WH> configure option is specified.
Yes, but it doesn't break for a default configure, which is the criteria for a show stopper in the RC phase. Of course +3 votes for anything is an automatic show stopper too, so we're one vote away from that. Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
