On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 08:01:12PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:12:18 -0700 Wes wrote: > WH> Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> writes: > WH> > WH> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote: > WH> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be > WH> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is > WH> > > WH> > I don't think this meets the criteria for a show-stopper, > WH> > since it's not part of the default build. > WH> > WH> It breaks that configure option entirely without the patch. > WH> It's a +1 for me since it breaks compilation entirely if that > WH> configure option is specified. > > Yes, but it doesn't break for a default configure, which is the > criteria for a show stopper in the RC phase. Of course +3 votes for > anything is an automatic show stopper too, so we're one vote away > from that.
+1 /MF > Robert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
