Hi Dave,
Thanks. I did the repeater(repetition) value experimentation based
on Roberts suggestion. Just want to be sure, but does setting the
non-repeater value to 1 have a similar functional effect to the a
command as the max-repetitions? i.e. Is this something that I cannot
ask an SNMP manager to do as it is non-standard or maybe it does not
provide the expected GetBulk optimization effect?
- John
--- On Thu 05/26, Dave Shield < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Dave Shield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:34:21 +0100
Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, changing the max-repeater to 1. Is changing these values
> to make a bulkwalk work an acceptable practice?
Changing the max-repetitions of a GetBulk to 1 is singularly
pointless. You might as well use GetNext in the first place.
Dave
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entir... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... Dave Shield
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... Robert Story
- Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]