On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote:
> On 6 May 2010 11:07, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote: > > The free port number detection issue has been fixed in r18651. > > Good work. > I've ported this (and other related patches) to the other relevant > branches. > The 5.2.x branch passes Cygwin regression tests OK (though not with > IPv6 support). Something is odd wrt 53x, but that's less urgent, > since it's not in release freeze mode. > > > > With this fix > > the only test that still fails is test 58 because the Cygwin port of > > snmpd.exe reports incorrect information in the udpTable. > > > Another issue that I discovered and that is not covered by any regression > > test is that the information reported in tcpConnTable does not match the > > output of netstat. > > I'm inclined to suggest that these two problems shouldn't hold up > the 5.4.3 (and 5.2.6) releases any longer - this process has > dragged on long enough already! > I'm proposing to package up the current code as rc3 tarballs > tomorrow, with a view to these being the final releases. > > Yell now if you strongly disagree :-) > There is one open issue for the V5.4 branch I'm absolutely not happy with: http://www.mail-archive.com/net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25049.html . Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
