On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk>wrote:
> On 6 May 2010 17:12, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote: > > There is one open issue for the V5.4 branch I'm absolutely not happy > with: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25049.html > . > > That seems to be a consequence of patch #2890931 > (to add support of Counter64 values within the perl module). > > I've had a quick attempt to add 'snmplib/strtoull.c' to the Win32 build > environment, but without any success. I'm inclined to reverse the > above patch (and re-open the tracker entry), so that we can get the > releases out with no further delay. > > Unless anyone can provide a fix for the strtoull compilation problem.... > > Note that the only other occurance of this call are as follows: > > mibgroup/util_funcs > sctp-mib/sctp{Scalars,Tables}_linux.c > udp-mib/data_access/udp_endpoint_linux.c > > (all Linux-only code) > > if-mib/data_access_interface.c > > (any architecture) > The Perl Counter64 code is buggy anyway, with or without patch #2890931. According to the strtoul() and strtoull() man pages, it is not guaranteed that errno is set when the conversion of a non-zero argument succeeded. See also http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/strtoul.html. Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
