Yes .... an interesting observation which I agree with but the initial statement did not give a readable description to such ideas that one might understand when reading original email........ as an artist sitting in a studio on a cold thursday evening in east London....
On 7 Jan 2010, at 22:27, Rob Myers wrote: > On 07/01/10 18:34, martin mitchell wrote: >> How does one translate into another language part of dogmatic statements >> like 'running past', 'flag up' or 'socio economic' ........! >> > > I don't think that the expressions you identify are dogmatic. It could > be argued that they have their origin in managerial jargon (they > certainly aren't artworld jargon), but I think that they are just > examples of contemporary public written English. > > I think that the impact of the Olympics on people's lives is an > important concrete, specific, local example of the kind of current > events that need criticising and that art can usefully criticise (being > all about aesthetics eclipsing ethics). The abstract, general, gobal > criteria of a call such as Multichannel 3 don't preclude that kind of > thing - quite the opposite, they are an opportunity to make a noise > about it that otherwise wouldn't exist. > > - Rob. > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
