Since they are rather simple scripts I don't think it's necessary to copyright/copyleft them at all. I leave them in the public domain, including the snippet pasted in this thread. Later I'll prepare a more complete and tidy source code and upload it.
Thanks for the article, it was also fairly instructive on how it was made, algorithms. On the sideline, an interesting point is the x-ray property of children's drawings. There's always been speculation about why old petroglyphs, for example norwegian - is depicting animals or humans as transparent - if it had a magical or instructive function etc. But maybe it's more like an "imagined" scene than an optical perspective, and maybe because that's closer to an origin of drawing. "Rose’s deviation from optical perspective is even more apparent when rendering the topological relationship of enclosure. Figures 17 & 18 show Rose’s experience and subsequent drawing of a person inside a house with “food” inside the body. The conventional rendering of the experience model reveals little. Rose’s drawing is not an “X-Ray” or transparent view of the scene. Inspired by children’s drawings, it is a constructed two-dimensional equivalent of the “imagined” scene." Also thanks for the feedback, Bjørn On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/01/10 10:39, Bjørn Magnhildøen wrote: >> <?php >> > Thank you for the code! Would you be willing to place it under the GPL? > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html > > When talking about scribbling machines I always think of Ed Burton's ROSE - > > http://www.eg.org/EG/CGF/Volume14/Issue3/v14i3pp159-170_abstract.html > > I love the variety and range of complexity of your images. > > - Rob. > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
