fyi, i put the core source code to
http://noemata.net/time().mt_rand/text/source_code_12649370689855.txt
(not very different from what already pasted here)

Bjørn

2010/1/27 Bjørn Magnhildøen <[email protected]>:
> Since they are rather simple scripts I don't think it's necessary to
> copyright/copyleft them at all. I leave them in the public domain,
> including the snippet pasted in this thread. Later I'll prepare a more
> complete and tidy source code and upload it.
>
> Thanks for the article, it was also fairly instructive on how it was
> made, algorithms.
> On the sideline, an interesting point is the x-ray property of
> children's drawings. There's always been speculation about why old
> petroglyphs, for example norwegian - is depicting animals or humans as
> transparent - if it had a magical or instructive function etc. But
> maybe it's more like an "imagined" scene than an optical perspective,
> and maybe because that's closer to an origin of drawing.
> "Rose’s deviation from optical perspective is even more apparent when
> rendering the topological relationship
> of enclosure. Figures 17 & 18 show Rose’s experience and subsequent
> drawing of a person inside a house
> with “food” inside the body. The conventional rendering of the
> experience model reveals little. Rose’s drawing
> is not an “X-Ray” or transparent view of the scene. Inspired by
> children’s drawings, it is a constructed
> two-dimensional equivalent of the “imagined” scene."
>
> Also thanks for the feedback,
>
> Bjørn
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 26/01/10 10:39, Bjørn Magnhildøen wrote:
>>> <?php
>>>
>> Thank you for the code! Would you be willing to place it under the GPL?
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
>>
>> When talking about scribbling machines I always think of Ed Burton's ROSE -
>>
>> http://www.eg.org/EG/CGF/Volume14/Issue3/v14i3pp159-170_abstract.html
>>
>> I love the variety and range of complexity of your images.
>>
>> - Rob.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to