yep this is a tedious process that some of us on this list had to go 
thru a few years ago, with entries for furtherfield, cyberformance & 
UpStage. it was pretty frustrating & the process for getting things 
undeleted & working out the wikipedia rules & processes was pretty 
circular. but in the end we managed to salvage everything.

it does require people to contribute - which is not a bad thing in 
itself. just that at least in the past, the majority of people 
contributing place knowledge about obscure science fiction characters as 
being of more importance than established & productive arts 
organisations. this is changing as more of us start to contribute, & the 
more of us who contribute, the easier it is for all of us to contribute 
because we don't have to spend months defending the legitimacy of 
clearly legitimate things.

h : )

On 20/03/10 1:19 PM, Jim Andrews wrote:
>> Bearcat is clearly a "deletionist". They are a real problem, and not just
>> for well-referenced notable articles about art. They are convinced (and
>> convince each other) that they are making Wikipedia better by removing
>> articles based not so much on technicalities as on ostentatious ignorance
>> of Wikipedia's own stated aims and criteria. They are wrong.
>>
>> - Rob.
>>      
> Given our discussion, I determined to give trying to get that article on
> wikipedia another go. And I find that the article has been undeleted, now,
> which is good. Though there is no indication who undeleted it in the
> 'history' section. No history of the deletions at all, actually.
>
> I see it has been worked on by several people, now. Including the ding bat
> deletionist who deleted it three or four times, three of which were for bad
> reasons.
>
> They added internal links and categories.
>
> I hadn't checked on it in a couple of months, was getting tired of the
> stupid deletions for bad reasons.
>
> My account had also been deleted. Had to recreate it today.
>
> ja
> http://vispo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>    


-- 
____________________________________________________________

helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst
[email protected]
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.avatarbodycollision.org
http://www.upstage.org.nz
____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to