Hi Simon As a bactery myself I thought that culture was the total of human thought and practises and not the way life grows on a petri dish.
But that's problably an 'art' related term not suited for discussions dealing with humans What are we talking about biology or humanities? Or maybe the concept of 'autopoiesis' viewed as a post gnostic? Adamos as the bringer of truth for herbal life? Or is this supposed to be 'cross cultural'? I am very sorry, but being aquintant with the works of Guattari and the father of cybernetics; Norbert Wiener, I am having difficulties with the obviousness of these theses Some interesting works: See: Fransisco Varela et al.: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Varela Guatari:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Félix_Guattari Norbert Wiener:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Wiener Andreas Maria Jacobs w: http://www.nictoglobe.com w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl On 29 Dec 2010, at 12:24, Simon Biggs <[email protected]> wrote: > Bacteria is the very definition of culture! As Les Patterson (sometime > cultural attache for Australia) said, "culture - that's what grows > between > your toes". > > Best > > Simon > > > On 29/12/2010 08:53, "De wraak van Baltassar Geraards" <[email protected] > > > wrote: > >>> 4. Culture is all the way down; every organism is a priori cultural. >> >> Agree partly, what are the cultural products of for instance >> bacteria? > > > Simon Biggs > [email protected] > http://www.littlepig.org.uk/ > > [email protected] > http://www.elmcip.net/ > http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/ > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
