Aha...

Get your drift ;-)

marc
> Not talking about Furtherfield, Marc. Unless you are part of the Wall Street
> propelled Art Market.
>
> -Joel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "marc garrett"<[email protected]>
> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 8:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] I don't know what to think anymore
>
>
> So, should we shut down furtherfield on-line projects and the gallery?
>
> marc
>> Marc;
>>
>> I think what's happening was inevitable, as wealth and power becomes
>> concentrated into a few hands, the population grows, and resources become
>> scarce.
>> So perhaps its time for artists to drop out of the "art scene" and not
>> feed
>> the monster.
>>    Not a bad thing, as it can mean a rebirth of work over which the Art
>> Market
>> has no power.
>>
>> -Joel
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "marc garrett"<[email protected]>
>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
>> <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] I don't know what to think anymore
>>
>>
>> Hi Simon&   Antonio,
>>
>> Yesterday was a significant day. A big shift politically, where the
>> ideology of a neo-liberalist agenda successfully disarmed half of the
>> media art world in the UK. Some excellent groups who were grass roots,
>> doing amazing stuff were attacked. I can't even bring myself to mention
>> their names at present, because it feels too raw.
>>
>> Already in the UK, artist groups have been just about surviving on
>> minimal amounts of income. This recent attack has lessened their power
>> to make 'real' change in the world. Currently, my toleration for those
>> who say that 'if you are arts council funded you are not radical', as
>> they themselves are about as socially engaged as a wet muppet - all
>> mouth no trousers. There has been some excellent art collectives and
>> groups receiving revenue in the UK from Arts Council funding, whilst
>> actively changing things via their own, critical approaches.
>>
>> What has happened is, those who are already supported by and part of, an
>> established elite have gained even more power. If we thought that things
>> were bad before, get ready for next wave of corporatized zombie led
>> manouvering, implementations of conservative ideologies flooding the art
>> world. Already the established art world was propping up useless and
>> culturally vapid artists via protocols, defined from top-down
>> initiatives. It was already hard to convince galleries and art magazines
>> to allow media context and its practice to be seen in their frameworks,
>> now they have yet another excuse to stay in the same state of denial,
>> and escape the responsibility of having an awareness of work more
>> relevant than their own limited remits, let alone a small glimmer of
>> imagination.
>>
>> marc.
>>
>> wishing you well.
>>
>>
>>    >   The days when an artist could rely on ACE for an income are long
>> gone.
>>    >   1998/99 was the key period, when major restructuring of ACE (at the
>> behest
>>    >   of the new Labour government) meant that direct funding to artists
>> was
>>    >   replaced by a focus on funding institutions and regional areas. The
>> closing
>>    >   off of the tap for direct funding to artists from the National
>> Lottery,
>>    >   specifically the closure of the Film Councils support for
>> experimental
>>    >   practice, was the single most negative hit the new media arts sector
>> has
>>    >   taken over the past decades (along with the closure of the Film and
>> Video
>>    >   unit of ACE). Since that time it hasn't been possible for an artist
>> to make
>>    >   a living from ACE supported activities. Artists that had benefitted
>> from
>>    >   ACE's prior largesse (happily I was amongst them) had to find
>> alternate
>>    >   means to support their work.
>>    >
>>    >   That doesn't make what happened yesterday any more palatable. The
>> cuts made
>>    >   are amongst the most profound that I can remember and many worthy
>> groups and
>>    >   companies have suffered. This has happened as the direct result of
>>    >   government policy. ACE had little choice when its budget was cut by a
>> third
>>    >   - the big question was whether to cut everyone a little or a few a
>> lot. They
>>    >   went for the latter option. There are arguments for and against
>> either
>>    >   option. Understanding why this has happened doesn't dull the pain for
>> those
>>    >   that have lost out.
>>    >
>>    >   Best
>>    >
>>    >   Simon
>>    >
>>    >
>>    >   On 30/03/2011 23:09, "Antonio Roberts"<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>    >
>>    >>   http://www.flickr.com/photos/hellocatfood/5575389294/
>>    >>
>>    >>   "After reading the Arts Council's funding decisions today I'm really
>>    >>   not sure how I feel about them and the whole art world in general.
>>    >>
>>    >>   I should just give up now. An artists' income is largely dependent
>> on
>>    >>   the government/Arts Council and they currently are more keen on
>>    >>   cutting funding and trying to convince us that it'll be great
>>    >>   challenge for our creativity. What a load of crap. A challenge is
>>    >>   good, unemployment is not.
>>    >>
>>    >>   What a crap day"
>>    >>   _______________________________________________
>>    >>   NetBehaviour mailing list
>>    >>   [email protected]
>>    >>   http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>    >>
>>    >
>>    >
>>    >   Simon Biggs
>>    >   [email protected]
>>    >   http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
>>    >
>>    >   [email protected]
>>    >   http://www.elmcip.net/
>>    >   http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
>>    >
>>    >
>>    >   _______________________________________________
>>    >   NetBehaviour mailing list
>>    >   [email protected]
>>    >   http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>    >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to