On 06/03/12 17:03, marc garrett wrote: > > I think it's obvious that G&G are elitists, and would not wish to lose > any income from their bourgeois client base.
Their original artistic gesture was to conflate aesthetic and social form. This was interesting but over time it has led to their public pronouncements increasingly being bad form, in the Terry-Thomas sense. > Who gives a shit whether they work from 5. am or not - many work just as > hard for much less, and are losing their jobs, communities, and much > more - they are not relevant. Yes hard work is not sufficient to explain personal wealth, whatever the psychological needs of the rich or indeed the simply not impoverished. - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
