Hmm yes -I'm not convinced ( as I remain unconvinced by so many arguments for the qualitative newness of the digital) that the the glitch is at all new, any more than, for example, the remix. Leodrado wrote somewhere about finding images in blots and I would put money that there is *no artist, ever, no matter how tidy, organised and prescient* who has not incorporated mistakes, blots, slips, tears &c into work... cheers michael
----- Original Message ----- From: James Morris <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Sabotage! glitch politix Man[ual/ifesto] On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:56:14 +0000 James Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:41:45 -0500 > [email protected] wrote: > > > http://www.tacticalgl.it/ches/txt/sabotage.html > > > > I'm Curt Cloninger, and I approve this message. > > _______________________________________________ > > NetBehaviour mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > I am James Morris, and I read your message. I Don't know how to glitch > it, sorry. > > However, I just this minute was pressing the Random button on XKCD and > this popped up: > > http://xkcd.com/371/ Actually, concerning the statement saying glitches did not existence before machines, I did wonder what about glitches in the mind/brain/perception etc? What causes them to not be glitches? Does intoxication cause glitches or not? Glitches in behaviour? Mental health? Etc. Then I thought there was probably some subtlely in the text I'd failed to notice which might have answered my question if only I this or that... Thanks for posting! _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
