yep! and I see I just made up someone called Leodrado which is the <fleshy creaturliness, with all it's bubbly, slippery ungainliness> of my 57 years old eyesight and fingers.... cheers m.
----- Original Message ----- From: Simon Mclennan <[email protected]> To: Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]>; NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 4:20 PM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Sabotage! glitch politix Man[ual/ifesto] The glitch is not new I agree, however we are desperate to maintain a relationship with our living, fleshy creaturliness, with all it's bubbly, slippery ungainliness, in the face of --- computers and their ticking time bomb of perfection ---- such that we despair to find the glitch -- in their narrow beam of becoming blah ha blah ha ha, blah, bl bl bl... errr, bubble an squeek and all that On 1 Feb 2014, at 15:18, Michael Szpakowski wrote: > Hmm yes -I'm not convinced ( as I remain unconvinced by so many > arguments for the qualitative newness of the digital) that the the > glitch is at all new, any more than, for example, the remix. > Leodrado wrote somewhere about finding images in blots and I would > put money that there is *no artist, ever, no matter how tidy, > organised and prescient* who has not incorporated mistakes, blots, > slips, tears &c into work... > cheers > michael > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James Morris <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 3:01 PM > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Sabotage! glitch politix Man[ual/ifesto] > > On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:56:14 +0000 > James Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:41:45 -0500 >> [email protected] wrote: >> >>> http://www.tacticalgl.it/ches/txt/sabotage.html >>> >>> I'm Curt Cloninger, and I approve this message. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> >> I am James Morris, and I read your message. I Don't know how to >> glitch >> it, sorry. >> >> However, I just this minute was pressing the Random button on XKCD >> and >> this popped up: >> >> http://xkcd.com/371/ > > Actually, concerning the statement saying glitches did not > existence before machines, I did wonder what about glitches in the > mind/brain/perception etc? What causes them to not be glitches? > Does intoxication cause glitches or not? Glitches in behaviour? Mental > health? Etc. Then I thought there was probably some subtlely in the > text I'd failed to notice which might have answered my question if > only > I this or that... > > > Thanks for posting! > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
