works best in firefox On 15 March 2015 at 17:16, dave miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://davemiller.org/projects/netartizens/ > > On 15 March 2015 at 15:23, Edward Picot <[email protected]> wrote: > >> When we weren't inundated with email, social media, how the mailing lists >> continued to play! As a result, then, of course planning and structure >> today. Nowadays, we take a heroic certainty into the needs of the times. In >> The 1990s the lists, our artwork and range of outputs were aimed for >> research, in a large stamped addressed envelope. Text messaging, etc., as >> in the practice of Renga, desired an eventual dissolve: a fundamental >> fling: to ratify rather than reappropriate. To keep up with one's large >> numbers of participants or patterns. We wait for the rage to criticise or >> we attempt to feed each other's collabs, where particular kinds of cohesion >> are sacrificed. Righteous mobs survive because who has time for >> alternatives? Gleefully we spout these insults. Spaces are for battling. No >> playfulness, the sheer information overload we deserve. The wind-down. Do >> we all do this anymore? Each participant completely controls their part. >> They can’t last, these discourses of increasing complexity and >> overabundance, and I am always surprised by the next mediation bump. >> Rage-fatigue. The dilemma of every single minute. We await the structure >> that everyone has input within the parameters of the scale funded piece. We >> refuse anything that wasn't inundated with email, social media, digital >> communications. Of course planning. Of course structure. Of course planning >> and structure. We take a heroic certainty into the needs of the times, to >> keep up with large numbers of participants or a special time for list >> patterns. We wait for rage or duty or right to criticise or we attempt to >> feed each other those kinds of collabs where the particular kinds of output >> or cohesion are sacrificed. The sheer information overload we deserve. We >> await the wind-down. They can’t last, these discourses. We refuse anything >> that calms. Anything that might be Japanese. Call them to account! Anything >> they do for our ongoing critique of net behaviors, opinions, a strategy >> that meets the hours, is important. And having said that, I've done what >> must always be done, because they were new, and our everyday lives are new, >> and section is sacrosanct, and no-one has the Japanese call. We are >> important. And having said that, we live everyday lives, and no-one has the >> call. No-one has the call. >> >> - Edward >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
