http://davemiller.org/projects/netartizens/
On 15 March 2015 at 15:23, Edward Picot <[email protected]> wrote: > When we weren't inundated with email, social media, how the mailing lists > continued to play! As a result, then, of course planning and structure > today. Nowadays, we take a heroic certainty into the needs of the times. In > The 1990s the lists, our artwork and range of outputs were aimed for > research, in a large stamped addressed envelope. Text messaging, etc., as > in the practice of Renga, desired an eventual dissolve: a fundamental > fling: to ratify rather than reappropriate. To keep up with one's large > numbers of participants or patterns. We wait for the rage to criticise or > we attempt to feed each other's collabs, where particular kinds of cohesion > are sacrificed. Righteous mobs survive because who has time for > alternatives? Gleefully we spout these insults. Spaces are for battling. No > playfulness, the sheer information overload we deserve. The wind-down. Do > we all do this anymore? Each participant completely controls their part. > They can’t last, these discourses of increasing complexity and > overabundance, and I am always surprised by the next mediation bump. > Rage-fatigue. The dilemma of every single minute. We await the structure > that everyone has input within the parameters of the scale funded piece. We > refuse anything that wasn't inundated with email, social media, digital > communications. Of course planning. Of course structure. Of course planning > and structure. We take a heroic certainty into the needs of the times, to > keep up with large numbers of participants or a special time for list > patterns. We wait for rage or duty or right to criticise or we attempt to > feed each other those kinds of collabs where the particular kinds of output > or cohesion are sacrificed. The sheer information overload we deserve. We > await the wind-down. They can’t last, these discourses. We refuse anything > that calms. Anything that might be Japanese. Call them to account! Anything > they do for our ongoing critique of net behaviors, opinions, a strategy > that meets the hours, is important. And having said that, I've done what > must always be done, because they were new, and our everyday lives are new, > and section is sacrosanct, and no-one has the Japanese call. We are > important. And having said that, we live everyday lives, and no-one has the > call. No-one has the call. > > - Edward > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
