I think the focus in the JavaFX area should be very narrowly on Maven support.
Maybe there should only be three tasks in the spec, i.e., I think we should focus as narrowly as possible on exactly what we want people to test -- and not have lots of tasks that may be less relevant: 1. Using the Gluon OpenJFX project templates to set up a project. 2. Defining run, debug, etc -- we should provide a tutorial for this, though once this is complete, that won't be needed since nbactions will be generated by the templates: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3104 3. Integration with JavaFX Scene Builder, if any. Gj On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:21 PM Glenn Holmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Have we decided which specs we're going to use to test FX support? > Geertjan went through the existing ones and recommended that most of > them be considered obsolete. > > On the Synergy home page, we see a new spec "JavaFX - JDK 13 / 8 > Projects and Deployments", updated by Scott Palmer. Is this ready for > testing, or does it need more updates? Considering the radical changes > FX has been through, are this one and the existing Scene Builder spec > enough for testing FX support in 12.0? > > -- > Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
