Yes, 0.0.5 is the current release, since a day or two.

I would recommend to not go with Ernie's work but instead with the official
0.0.5 and the nbactions that will be generated automatically once the API
is updated to enable an nbactions file to be added when the Maven
co-ordinates are registered:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3104

Not sure why you're flummoxed by Johan from Gluon being happy with the
Gluon OpenJFX integration in NetBeans. :-)

Gj

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:39 PM Glenn Holmer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 3/6/20 4:46 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Maybe there should only be three tasks in the spec, i.e., I think we
> should
> > focus as narrowly as possible on exactly what we want people to test --
> and
> > not have lots of tasks that may be less relevant:
> >
> > 1. Using the Gluon OpenJFX project templates to set up a project.
> >
> > 2. Defining run, debug, etc -- we should provide a tutorial for this,
> > though once this is complete, that won't be needed since nbactions will
> be
> > generated by the templates:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3104
> >
> > 3. Integration with JavaFX Scene Builder, if any.
>
> I agree. In my opinion, the most important thing is that users should be
> able to create an FX project that will run, debug, profile, and show
> Javadoc without manual intervention (i.e. without editing pom.xml and
> nbactions.xml).
>
> But I'm quite confused as to the current situation.
>
> re. 2), what's the current state of javafx-maven-plugin? It looks from
> bug reports like it's been updated to 0.0.4, but I'm not finding that
> when I search in "Project from Archetype". However, I even see an 0.0.5
> here:
>
> https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.openjfx/javafx-archetype-simple
>
> Then there are Ernie Rael's patches:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202002.mbox/%3C53d5b577-0cce-17c7-72e8-0f5e36435f35%40raelity.com%3E
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202002.mbox/%[email protected]%3e
>
> The archetype search in the New Project dialog itself seems confusing,
> since if I search on "Simple JavaFX", I get "Simple JavaFX Maven
> Archetype", versions 0.0.3 and 0.0.1, from org.openjfx (but only if I
> select "Show Older"), and if I search on "rael", I also see a "Simple
> JavaFX Maven Archetype", version 0.0.1, from com.raelity.jfx. All this
> was after a Maven download and index.
>
> See also this, which totally flummoxes me:
>
> https://twitter.com/johanvos/status/1235879784825184258
>
> --
> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to